WebThe AMD FX-6100 has six processing cores, which is above average for a desktop CPU. Single and dual core performance is weak scoring amongst the bottom 30% of desktop processors. Multi core performance is better … WebThe FX-6300 and the FX-6100 have the same L2 cache size, and the same L3 cache size, so in terms of cache-related gaming performance, the two CPUs are too similar to judge.

Core i7-860 vs FX-6100 [in 4 benchmarks] - technical.city

WebThe AMD FX-6100 has six processing cores, which is above average for a desktop CPU. Single and dual core performance is weak scoring amongst the bottom 30% of desktop processors. Multi core performance is better but still barely above the bottom 10% of processors. At nearly three years of age, the FX-6100 struggles to compete with more … WebBased on 6,028 user benchmarks for the AMD FX-6200 Six-Core and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,405 CPUs. ... Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of … over achieved meaning

AMD FX-6100 Specs TechPowerUp CPU Database

WebFX-6100 is a high-end CPU based on the 32nm Bulldozer architecture. It offers 6 Physical Cores (6 Logical), initially clocked at 3.3GHz, which may go up to 3.6GHz and 8MB of L3 Cache. Among its... WebIn terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-6100 is noticeably better than the AMD FX-4300 when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less … WebDec 19, 2011 · The FX6100 is actually an alright chip for the money regardless of what everyone else is running. The worst thing about the OP's setup is the 1333mhz memory, the FX will perform a lot better with... over access